HUMAN RIGHTS OF EUROPEAN JUVENILES
Δημοσιεύτηκε: 08 Μαρ 2010 18:57
Kind regards,
I am Vasileios T.
The letter of the following page (Brussels, 29 JAN 2010 SCIC.02/SP/ms/D(2010) 49095) is already sent to the EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
Susan Phillips (EUROPEAN COMMISSION - DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERPRETATION)
informed me that it was reassigned to Mr. Jonathan FAULL,
Director General of Justice, Freedom and Security DG, B-1049 Brussels.
Nevertheless I inform you on this affair.
Yours sincerely,
Vasileios T.
-----------------------------------------------
this is the letter
Hello
I am Vasileios T. from Greece.
We Europeans and our European Court MUST CHANGE SOME RULES ABOUT RELIGIOUS RIGHTS IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
It is ILLIGAL for the European Court of Human Rights not to protect Human Rights for ANY REASON.
I know that each country has the right to regulate alone religious guidance and educational propaganda to unformed and deceivable juvenile.
Juvenile people (yes, they are people with rights) have not yet developed the intellectual defence to filter religious propaganda, and to develop unaffected individual view about the object of the religious propaganda and the religion it self.
According to official scientific researches but also according to ALMOST EVERY LEGAL SYSTEM Juvenile People are not physically and mentally ready to be expected to cope with the same issue with the same effectiveness of an adult.
Therefore Juvenile People are not mentally ready to cope with religious propaganda.
Juvenile People are protected by the law more than adults in many cases, even if they are the victimizer because they are more prone to incorrect decisions, due to their youth and immaturity.
The religion we believe as true is not imprinted to our DNA but is a result mainly of adscititious factors.
We have no right to eliminate the factors which make us choose a religion.
WE DO NOT ONLY HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT BUT WE MUST PROTECT JUVENILE PEOPLE ACCORDING TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS!
According to the current laws, the European Court of Human Rights has NO RIGHT to force any European Country to RESPECT JUVENILE PEOPLE.
This law contradicts against the fundamental Human Rights and laws that the European Court of Human Rights defends.
Therefore I will prosecute the European Court of Human Rights and the European Union for failing to protect Juvenile people.
The prosecution will be deposited to the European Court of Human Rights.
The European Court of Human Rights was instituted to protect Human Rights.
Many times, all the legal systems have some juristic incoherences, because it's very hard to enact laws.
In those cases, the legislator has to harmonize the secondary laws to the fundamental law. This fact does not constitute oddness, but basic legislative process to all juristical systems.
The new countries which enter the European Union, MUST RESPECT THE HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE RIGHTS OF JUVENILE PEOPLE.
If the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights do not harmonize the law THAT ALLOWS COUNTRIES TO INFRINGE RELIGIOUS RIGHTS of adults and juvenile people, to the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS that the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights defend relentlessly, I will be perforced to appeal to the European Court of Human Rights against the European Union and also against the European Court of Human Rights, asking from them to respect the fundamental rights that the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights defend.
I will have to ask for nomothetic act of harmonization to the most fundamental law. Namely harmonization to the laws that protect juvenile people, religious freedom and HUMAN RIGHTS, because the people who don't follow the Governmental religion, unavoidably are considered OUTCASTS.
If the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights decide to officially stop protecting Human Rights by legislative act and new European treaty, I will no longer demand from them to protect Human Rights.
But as long as the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights are the supreme legal and statutory stern defenders of Human Rights, I have all the legal rights to ask for nomothetic reconcilement, even for satisfaction (amends).
The European Court of Human Rights knows this jurisprudential incoherence.
If the European Court of Human Rights would fail to defend Human Rights and would not go along to this legislative harmonization I will appeal to the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
The International Court of Justice will not demand from the European Court of Human Rights and the European Union to follow specific religious policy for all European Countries. It will just demand from the European Court of Human Rights and the European Union just to harmonize their laws. To force them choose if they want to be fully apposite or fully inapposite as the legal defenders of Human Rights, and to eliminate juristic inconsistencies.
my name: Vasileios T.
my address: Har. Trikoupi 27
P.O. box 166 75
Glyfada - Attiki (Athens)
G R E E C E
my telephone number: 0030 6974062246
Thank you for your time!
Please contact me!
I believe in Europe, that's why I care.
I am Vasileios T.
The letter of the following page (Brussels, 29 JAN 2010 SCIC.02/SP/ms/D(2010) 49095) is already sent to the EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
Susan Phillips (EUROPEAN COMMISSION - DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERPRETATION)
informed me that it was reassigned to Mr. Jonathan FAULL,
Director General of Justice, Freedom and Security DG, B-1049 Brussels.
Nevertheless I inform you on this affair.
Yours sincerely,
Vasileios T.
-----------------------------------------------
this is the letter
Hello
I am Vasileios T. from Greece.
We Europeans and our European Court MUST CHANGE SOME RULES ABOUT RELIGIOUS RIGHTS IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
It is ILLIGAL for the European Court of Human Rights not to protect Human Rights for ANY REASON.
I know that each country has the right to regulate alone religious guidance and educational propaganda to unformed and deceivable juvenile.
Juvenile people (yes, they are people with rights) have not yet developed the intellectual defence to filter religious propaganda, and to develop unaffected individual view about the object of the religious propaganda and the religion it self.
According to official scientific researches but also according to ALMOST EVERY LEGAL SYSTEM Juvenile People are not physically and mentally ready to be expected to cope with the same issue with the same effectiveness of an adult.
Therefore Juvenile People are not mentally ready to cope with religious propaganda.
Juvenile People are protected by the law more than adults in many cases, even if they are the victimizer because they are more prone to incorrect decisions, due to their youth and immaturity.
The religion we believe as true is not imprinted to our DNA but is a result mainly of adscititious factors.
We have no right to eliminate the factors which make us choose a religion.
WE DO NOT ONLY HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT BUT WE MUST PROTECT JUVENILE PEOPLE ACCORDING TO THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS!
According to the current laws, the European Court of Human Rights has NO RIGHT to force any European Country to RESPECT JUVENILE PEOPLE.
This law contradicts against the fundamental Human Rights and laws that the European Court of Human Rights defends.
Therefore I will prosecute the European Court of Human Rights and the European Union for failing to protect Juvenile people.
The prosecution will be deposited to the European Court of Human Rights.
The European Court of Human Rights was instituted to protect Human Rights.
Many times, all the legal systems have some juristic incoherences, because it's very hard to enact laws.
In those cases, the legislator has to harmonize the secondary laws to the fundamental law. This fact does not constitute oddness, but basic legislative process to all juristical systems.
The new countries which enter the European Union, MUST RESPECT THE HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE RIGHTS OF JUVENILE PEOPLE.
If the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights do not harmonize the law THAT ALLOWS COUNTRIES TO INFRINGE RELIGIOUS RIGHTS of adults and juvenile people, to the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS that the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights defend relentlessly, I will be perforced to appeal to the European Court of Human Rights against the European Union and also against the European Court of Human Rights, asking from them to respect the fundamental rights that the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights defend.
I will have to ask for nomothetic act of harmonization to the most fundamental law. Namely harmonization to the laws that protect juvenile people, religious freedom and HUMAN RIGHTS, because the people who don't follow the Governmental religion, unavoidably are considered OUTCASTS.
If the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights decide to officially stop protecting Human Rights by legislative act and new European treaty, I will no longer demand from them to protect Human Rights.
But as long as the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights are the supreme legal and statutory stern defenders of Human Rights, I have all the legal rights to ask for nomothetic reconcilement, even for satisfaction (amends).
The European Court of Human Rights knows this jurisprudential incoherence.
If the European Court of Human Rights would fail to defend Human Rights and would not go along to this legislative harmonization I will appeal to the International Court of Justice (ICJ).
The International Court of Justice will not demand from the European Court of Human Rights and the European Union to follow specific religious policy for all European Countries. It will just demand from the European Court of Human Rights and the European Union just to harmonize their laws. To force them choose if they want to be fully apposite or fully inapposite as the legal defenders of Human Rights, and to eliminate juristic inconsistencies.
my name: Vasileios T.
my address: Har. Trikoupi 27
P.O. box 166 75
Glyfada - Attiki (Athens)
G R E E C E
my telephone number: 0030 6974062246
Thank you for your time!
Please contact me!
I believe in Europe, that's why I care.